|
Follow-up
to the 1996 Geneva Conference on the Problems of Refugees, Displaced Persons,
Migration and Asylum Issues
(Working
Document on Thematic Issues)
Introduction
Theme C
Sustaining the
achievements and activities of the NGO sector and civil society, and promoting
further participation by international and local NGOS.
Lead agencies:
UNHCR, Council of Europe, IOM, OSCE/ODIHR and relevant NGOs
This theme is divided
to the following sub-themes: i) enabling environment: financial sustainability
(including government-NGO cooperation and legal/fiscal framework for NGOs, ii)
enabling environment: legal framework/political conditions/NGO-government cooperation,iii)
capacity building, and iv) PARinAC. The sub-themes are derived from the CIS Conference
Report and Recommendations as areas where future action should be taken.
To promote NGO
involvement in the other thematic groups of the CIS Conference follow-up, the
four issue-specific NGO working groups (emergency assistance, refugee law and
protection, repatriation, resettlement, integration, prevention and conflict resolution)
operational since 1997, are expected to continue to coordinate local NGOs inputs
and participation.
While most capacity-building
interventions and financial support to NGOs will be undertaken at the field level,
a regional meeting, bringing together NGOs, government representatives and the
donor community, will be held regularly. The participants will assess coordination
and cooperation, assess needs and make recommendations for further action. UNHCR
is prepared to serve as a catalyst for bringing together relevant inter-governmental
organizations, such as the Council of Europe, OSCE, IOM, UNDP and bilateral actors
supporting NGO sector development in the countries of the CIS and will explore
rotating chairmanship arrangements with participating organizations. The meeting
will review progress made in the areas of NGO capacity-building, financial support/sustainability
and NGO-government cooperation (including NGO legal frameworks).
Sub-theme(i): Enabling
environment- Financial sustainability
Lead agencies:
UNHCR (as catalyst), relevant NGOs, bi- and multilateral donors
The mainstreaming
of the NGO Fund of the CISCONF began in 1999 and will be fully integrated into
the unified budget system from 2001. The future focus will be on the provision
of support in mobilizing external resources (EU funding, international foundations,
local donors) and in enhancing donor coordination and cooperation. The NGO working
groups will seek to diversify their funding sources and provide fundraising support
to local NGOs. The sub-theme on enabling environment will deal in parallel with
issues related to financial sustainability of NGOs (private sector fundraising,
beneficial tax and customs treatment, etc.) that is being addressed by numerous
organizations at the national level.
The sub-group will
focus on exchanging information on best practices between countries, promote review
and development of procedures and legal frameworks that will maximize giving and
minimize abuse in regard to non-profit activities, explore country level funding
strategies for local NGOS, greater donor coordination and issues related to financial
management and fundraising skills among NGOS.
Sub-theme (ii):
Enabling environment: legal framework/political conditions/NGO-government cooperation
Lead agencies:
Council of Europe, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
This sub-theme
deals with legal frameworks for NGOs, including registration of organizations,
guaranteed quality of services, transparency and good governance of NGOs, government
supervision of public-benefit organizations, laws regulating foundations, non-profit
organizations, public-benefit and membership associations. Connected to the legal
status of NGOs are taxation and customs treatment of NGOS. Enabling environment
also refers to the recognition and understanding of NGOs by government bodies
and the general public.
This recognition
influences NGO access to governmental policy-making, joint activities and their
overall status within a society.
Sub-theme (iii):
Capacity-building
Lead agencies: UNHCR, IOM, NGO Working Groups
Capacity building
of local NGOs is done to develop their technical assistance and organizational
management skills with the purpose of partnership development and often, to hand-over
operations. Capacity building can be best done locally taking full advantage of
the existing resources and NGO support centers. Mainstreaming of capacity-building
interventions to the field will be carried out within UNHCR (field offices already
playing the main role) and through localizing capacity-building activities of
the NGO working groups to their respective field offices (DRC, NRC, Counterpart).
The NGO working groups are planning to enhance field coordination and cooperation
by setting up sub-regional focal points (NRC in Central Asia, DRC in the Caucasus)
IOM will continue its activities in Migration Sector National NGO Development
to enhance the capacity of NGOs to address migration related concerns. Links to
other relevant UN and bi-lateral agencies need to be enhanced to support the mainstreaming
(UNDP, UNICEF, USAID)
Sub-theme (iv):
PARinAC
Lead agency: UNHCR
Mainstreaming of
the CISCONF follow-up into PARinAC will be undertaken in coordination with UNHCR's
NGO coordinator to familiarize NGOs from the CIS with UNHCR's consultative mechanisms
with NGOs and identifying national and sub-regional PARinAC NGO focal points.
Theme D
Implementing Legislation
and Avoiding Implementation Gaps
Sub-Theme (i):
Refugee law implementation and avoiding implementation gaps
Lead agency: UNHCR
The work would
focus on the following three areas:
I . Pursuing 'quality
asylum'.
Issues of particular
attention would include equal treatment of asylum seekers in the region of both
UNHCR and national refugee bodies; complementary systems such as temporary protection
to meet the needs of non-Convention refugees; that asylum-seekers have access
to procedures in which their claims are heard fairly and promptly and that asylum-relevant
institutions develop to become effective and independent of external support;
creating / promoting monitoring mechanisms at entry points to ensure a transparent
process; ensuring that border officials are properly trained and sensitised on
refugee and asylum issues.
Work will also
focus on the need of asylum-seekers to have free legal advice, information and
interpretation assistance, through national and/or NGO legal support in all phases
of the RSD procedure, including during the appeal with suspensive effect. The
importance of up-to-date Country of Origin Information (COI) in working languages
of the region and developing a regional COI network as well as assisting Government
to establish/manage reception/counseling centers for asylum-seekers will also
be discussed.
2. Pursuing consistency
between regional approaches and international standards.
This area would
work on securing protection in the different sub- regional contexts and work towards
further supporting effective implementation of international refugee standards
in a context in which also more enlightened migration policies and harmonized
additional protection mechanisms could be developed.
3. Strengthening
partnerships in support of effective implementation of international refugee standards.
The work of this sub-theme would further explore, with non-traditional government
partners, with the NGO community and also with the corporate sector the scope
for working better together to improve the protection climate, including opportunities
for a co-operative relationship with Organisation partners, particularly where
migration and refugee flows merge.
Sub-Theme (ii):
Citizenship and Statelessness
Lead agency: UNHCR
and Council of Europe
All 12 States in
the CIS have adopted and periodically amended their nationality law since independence
in 1991; only two States have so far acceded to the 1954 Convention relating to
Status of Stateless Persons and 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness
, namely Armenia and Azerbaijan. The 1997 European Convention on Nationality has
so far been signed by two CIS states - the Russian Federation and Moldova.
It is important
to identify gaps, review and revise existing laws and procedures for their implementation
in order to make them more consistent and useful in practice. It is suggested
to conduct seminars on citizenship and the prevention of statelessness with governments
and non-governmental partners addressing the highest possible working level (primarily
of the respective Presidential administrations and ministries of interior in charge
of these issues), focusing both on legislative developments and on implementation,
and to support that financial assistance for implementation be made available.
IOM will have a role to play in this as citizenship issues are closely linked
to migration management (including border management) and in the integration process
of repatnants".
Sub-Theme (iii):
Migration legislation and avoiding implementation gaps.
Lead agency: IOM and OSCE/ODIHR
Research in the
late 1990s on migration flows in the CIS countries indicates that the total population
was 284 million persons of whom there were an estimated 25,300immigrants, 220,600
emigrants and 800,000 migrants.
Priority areas
for implementing migration legislation and avoiding gaps include:
1. Assisting those
States who have yet to adopt migration legislation and/or to establish a central
administrative body or an effective coordinating mechanism among the entities
involved with implementing legislation on migration and migration-related issues.
2. Assisting States
in adapting existing migration legislation to meet internationally accepted standards
of migration and border management.
3. Promoting legislative,
administrative and institutional measures to define and criminalize trafficking,
and ensure the effective prosecution and punishment of perpetrators of trafficking,
including intermediaries, along with appropriate protection, and support to victims
of trafficking, and facilitation of their return.
ODIHR will continue
working with interested states on improving their legislation and implementation
thereof in the area of migration legislation, especially in issues related to
freedom of movement (in the context of abolition of exit visas) and choice of
place of residence (in the context of replacing the Soviet-era propiska system
with non-discriminatory civil registration system), as well as to trafficking
of human beings.
|